Account Preservation plans in aspic for now

Government opt-out safeguards UK rescue culture

The Government has announced that it will opt out of European Commission plans to introduce a cross-border debt recovery tool that would have damaged the UK's business rescue culture. The European Account Preservation Order (EAPO) would have given courts anywhere in the EU the power to freeze funds in UK business' bank accounts without warning. R3, the leading insolvency trade association, had criticised plans to introduce the EAPO on the basis that it would give individual creditors the power to jeopardise the chances of business turnaround by starving companies of cash when they need it most. The UK is widely considered to be at the forefront of business turnaround and rescue and it was feared that the loose drafting of the EAPO would stifle attempts to rescue companies, leading to lower returns to creditors and damaging the wider economy.

The Government opt out is not a surprise as the Commons Select Committee on European Scrutiny had flagged up concerns regarding the EAPO during the summer. The Committee noted that, "Although the Government supports the principle of an European Account Preservation Order, we understand from recent communication with departmental officials that the Government thinks the text, as currently drafted, goes too far in favouring the rights of creditors at the expense of debtors." In particular, it was felt that there was insufficient requirement to demonstrate that there was a risk of assets being disposed of or concealed, meaning that applications could be made regardless of whether the situation merited the use of the EAPO.

This looks like a sensible approach: it is important to ensure that assets are handled properly at all stages of business recovery. But safeguarding assets must be balanced by the need to ensure that a company has the best chance of being rescued as a going concern, in order to save jobs, minimise the effect on supply chains and trading partners, and maximise the return to creditors.

What a wind up

Increase in number of firms being wound up by creditors

Insolvency statistics published today by the government’s Insolvency Service reveal that there has been a sharp increase in the number of firms being wound up by creditors in the past three months. The number of compulsory liquidations, where a creditor asks the courts to close down a business due to non-payment of debts, increased by nearly 20% compared to the previous quarter.

This looks like a worrying trend, showing that many firms are struggling to pay their way in the continuing economic gloom. Creditors are becoming impatient – many will be suffering with their own financial problems - and they are increasingly prepared to follow through on threats to wind up businesses that cannot afford to pay their bills.

Whilst it may be tempting to keep making promises of payment to creditors, when those promises are broken, the consequences can be catastrophic. The good news is that there are ways of dealing with mounting debts that will allow the company to continue and the sooner that a business owner takes advice, the more palatable the options that are available.

In particular, a Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA) can be put in place with the help of a licensed insolvency practitioner to protect the company from legal action whilst a turnaround plan is followed, allowing a company to recover from its cash-flow problems. In recent months, Moorhead Savage has set up three CVAs for businesses in the Sheffield City Region, safeguarding dozens of jobs in the process.

If you would like to chat about how we can help your business, call me today on 01709 331300.

Consultation leads to more... consultation

Bankruptcy and winding up petitions threshold may rise

The Government has announced a consultation on raising the level of debt that is required for a bankruptcy petition to be lodged at court. Currently, there must be debts of at least £750 before a creditor can petition for bankruptcy. This limit has remained the same for bankruptcy and winding up petitions since the Insolvency Act was brought into force in 1987 so it does seem overdue for review: £750 in 1987 was a considerable sum in real terms, in comparison to today.

R3, the leading insolvency trade body, has suggested that the limit should be raised to £3,000 for both bankruptcy and winding up petitions. The impact of this would be to limit the ability of creditors to use the draconian threat of bankruptcy (or winding up for companies) to enforce relatively low levels of debt. There is anecdotal evidence to suggest that local authorities are increasingly using bankruptcy petitions to enforce unpaid Council Tax liabilities, typically of less than £2,000.

This move was first suggested by David Cameron during the election campaign in January 2010 (see my earlier blog post about this) and today's announcement follows a more wide-ranging consultation on consumer finance and debt issues. It is unfair to suggest that this is the only interesting announcement to come out of the consultation, but the reality is that the Government's response to the consultation was to say that generally things are going OK and they will just keep an eye on everything and, guess what, there is more consultation planned.

To me, this suggests that the coalition Government has bigger fish to fry at the moment and they are kicking consumer debt and personal finance topics into the long grass until public sector cutbacks, defence spending reveiws, the pullout from Afghanistan, Libyan air operations, the Euro zone debt crisis and the News International affair are under control. Or until the media decides that consumer debt and personal finance and finance is the hot topic.

Shops 'til they drop

What has caused the sudden wave of retail insolvencies?

It has been a bad few days for retailers. A number of well-known names have succumbed to the effects of the retail slow-down, with Jane Norman and Habitat appointing administrators, TJ Hughes reportedly on the brink of entering administration and an announcement from chocolatier Thorntons that they intend to close up to half of their high street shops.This has come in the wake of retail figures for May that showed sales had slumped by 1.4%, reversing an increase of 1.1% the previous month.

Many retailers have been struggling for some time to keep their heads above water, with shoppers choosing to put off major purchases in the face of increasing economic uncertainty. Increasing food and fuel prices have hit consumers hard and many are concerned about job insecurity. The easy availability of credit that stoked the high street spending boom of the last decade is long gone. Shops have suffered from poor cashflow and slim margins, particularly where they are servicing high levels of borrowing.

But why the sudden wave of insolvencies? Traditionally, landlords collect rental payments from their tenants on a quarterly basis, in advance. The end of June sees another 'quarter day' when many retailers' rents will fall due for payment. With little opportunity to re-let shops to new tenants, landlords will be tempted to enforce harshly the terms of their existing leases, to prevent a melt-down of rental income. However, if landlords fail to work with their tenants when times are hard, they face the possibility of losing their tenant altogether if the tenant becomes insolvent. By using an administration procedure, struggling retailers are protected from their landlords taking action to lock them out whilst a new buyer is found, and a potential purchaser will often have the upper hand in any negotiations over future rents.

And what effect will this have on suppliers? When large firms become insolvent, they often leave many small suppliers high and dry, with little or no prospect of repayment. This can have a knock-on effect on their viability, and I'm afraid that many smaller businesses may be hit hard by the failure of these high street names.

But as always, the message is that help is at hand, and the sooner that advice is sought, the more palatable the options will be. Just because a major customer has let you down, it doesn't have to mean the end of your business as well. Call Paul Moorhead of Moorhead Savage today on 01709 331300 and find out what we can do to help.

Interesting times ahead?

Rising inflation raises concerns over interest rates

The UK Consumer Price Index annual rate of inflation rose to 4.5% in April 2011, its highest level since October 2008, according to figures released today. This has led to speculation that the Bank of England may raise interest rates in the coming months, causing more problems for struggling businesses.

A survey carried out by R3 found that many business owners are predicting that any rise in interest rates will have a serious impact on their business, with 7% of small business owners believing that they are likely to become insolvent if interest rates rise to between 2% and 3.5%. If rates climb to between 4% and 5%, the number of businesses at risk increases to 18%. The base rate was 5% in 2007.

The Office for National Statistics reported that inflation rose to 4.4% in February 2011, followed by a slight fall to 4% in March before increasing to 4.5% in April, way above the Bank of England’s target of 2%, which is likely to put pressure on the Monetary Policy Committee to increase rates.

Many commentators have suggested that historically low interest rates have helped to keep the number of business failures artificially low in recent months as debt interest payments are tied to the base rate for many businesses. However any increase in the cost of borrowing is likely to have an adverse effect on cash flow and may be the last straw for many ailing businesses.

Consumers will also feel the impact of any rise in interest rates as the cost of mortgages increases. An increase of two percentage points, whilst still low in historic terms, would add £166 per month to the cost of a £100,000 mortgage.

Rising prices put additional pressure on businesses and individuals, and increasing costs are likely to damage any fragile signs of recovery, adding to the finacial problems of many.

Moorhead Savage has the expertise and experience to help sort out financial problems - even when things seem bleak. For a free, no obligation consultation and an unbiased summary of which solutions are right for you, call Paul Moorhead today on 01709 331300. It's always good to talk.

Net property borrowing falls further

Homeowners' equity increases (but only because they are paying down debt)

UK homeowners repaid a record £7 billion in the final quarter of 2010 according to figures released today by the Bank of England. This is the eleventh quarter in a row that net property debts have decreased and the highest net repayment since records began in 1970.

It is likely that the reduction in debt is a result of more stringent lending policies by lenders who have been shaken by the banking meltdown in recent years. In addition a number of secured lenders have pulled out of the market all together as house prices  have plummeted, wiping out equity a d leaving many homeowners (and lenders) highly geared and dangerously exposed.
   
It seems clear that lax lending policies had a direct and devastating impact on the financial markets and the previous unsustainably high levels of lending have now been scaled back. But it also appears that consumers are not in a position to increase borrowing in order to take advantage of the lowest base rates in 315 years, which is an ominous development for high street spending and house prices in the coming months.

The challenge for banks is to ensure that the pendulum does not swing too far the other way, denying sensible levels of credit to responsible borrowers. A competitive market for sensible levels of credit is essential in a fully functioning free market economy, fostering enterprise and wealth creation. But anecdotal evidence suggests that the over-correction is in full swing.

Missed the tax deadline? It isn't the end of the world but act quickly

£90m penalties windfall for HMRC for late tax payments and tax returns

If you have missed the 31 January deadline for filing your Self Assessment Tax return, you are in good company. You are one of 9 million people who has yet to file their tax return for 2010-11. HM Revenue and Customs are looking forward to collecting around £90m in penalty fees from people who have filed their self assessment tax returns and/or paid the tax due after the 31 January deadline.

But don't be disheartened  - act quickly and you can avoid the situation getting any worse. The penalties charged by HMRC for late filed returns and late payments of tax rise as the delay increases, so if it's simply a question of an oversight, get it in ASAP and you'll save yourself some hard-earned cash.

And the good news is that if you have a 'reasonable excuse' for missing the deadline then you won't have to pay any penalty. But the bad news is that HMRC is unlikely to consider excuses relating to forgetfulness, the consumption of documents by pets, or delays due to overseas excursions, to be 'reasonable.' The rather short list of examples on their website includes documents lost through theft, fire or flood that can't be replaced in time, life-threatening illness, for example a heart attack that prevents you dealing with your tax affairs and the death of a partner shortly before the deadline.

If, however, the reason for the delay is that you know that you cannot afford to pay the tax due on last year's trading, then there is good news. By filing the tax return, even if the tax is unaffordable, you are then in a position to negotiate with HMRC for a 'time to pay' agreement. As long as your returns are filed up to date and you have a reasonable record of compliance with the tax authorities, you can put forward a repayment proposal. HMRC are generally willing to discuss sensible repayment plans, particularly if you approach them at the earliest opportunity.

If tax debts are part of a wider debt problem, it may be that a Voluntary Arrangement is the answer. These come in two flavours - Individual Voluntary Arrangments (IVAs) and Company Voluntary Arrangements (CVAs) depending on whether you trade through a limited company or are a sole trader. VAs of either variety can be a good way to solve cashflow problems and HMRC have a specialist department which deals with IVAs and CVAs, so they know what to look for in a well thought through proposal.

We have lots of experience in dealing with debt problems involving HMRC, so for expert, impartial and confidential advice, call us today on 01709 331300.

Plans to widen debt relief scheme

DRO eligibility to be amended

The Government today announced plans to make more people eligible for a debt relief scheme that allows individuals to write off unaffordable debt. The Debt Relief Order (DRO) was introduced in April 2009 and has been dubbed 'bankruptcy lite' - debts are written off in the same way as in bankruptcy, but the DRO is designed for people with very low value assets and little spare income after living expenses, where the full rigour of bankruptcy is unnecessarily cumbersome. Effectively, it is a way for over-indebted consumers to remove the burden of crippling debt that can never realistically be repaid. The idea is to draw a distinction between cases where debt is disputed or where the debtor may be able to repay but chooses not to, and cases where the debt is not in any doubt and nor is the fact that the debtor will never be able to repay it.

The main criteria for a DRO is debts of less than £15,000, surplus income after reasonable living expenses of less than £50 per month and total assets worth less than £300 (not including a car which may be worth up to £1,000). This makes a DRO available to a slender but statistically significant group of over-indebted individuals.

The plans unveiled today are to exempt pension plans from the asset cap. Previously, having a pension would mean that a debtor would fail the low asset requirement (assuming that the pension fund is worth more than £300.) As almost all pension policies are 'locked away' for use in retirement and aren't available for paying debts, it seems fair to exempt pensions from the equation. In addition, the Government is firmly entrenched in a policy of encouraging everyone to save for their retirement. It therefore makes sense to amend the criteria in a way which will have little effect on the likelihood of creditors recovering their debts.

More people than ever are becoming insolvent

Insolvency statistics give cause for concern

Official figures released by the Government’s Insolvency Service today show a 5% increase in the number of people getting into serious financial difficulties in the last three months. Although the number of bankruptcies has dropped by nearly 20% in the past year, the overall number of people becoming insolvent has increased as greater use is made of alternative ways of tackling high debt levels.

It seems clear that many people are struggling to cope with the effects of the downturn and record numbers are becoming insolvent. Job losses and cuts in overtime payments are making life difficult for households. This means that debt that was previously affordable can become a real problem. And as public sector spending cuts start to kick in, the situation is likely to get even worse.

In the first six months of 2010, over 70,000 people have become insolvent – the equivalent of a town the size of Barnsley or Chesterfield.

The cost of becoming bankrupt has increased in recent months and this may have encouraged people to look at alternatives. In particular, the new Debt Relief Order has become more popular since it was introduced last year. The good news is that there is help available – but I would recommend that anyone in difficulties should take advice from a reputable organisation. Beware of unsolicited calls offering advice that sounds too good to be true.

To find out what all your options are, call me today on 01709 331300.

Getting away from it all can lead to problems back home

Millions get into debt for a holiday

The insolvency trade body R3 released figures today showing that over 2 million holidaymakers have got into debt to pay for holidays this year and will spend an average of seven months paying it back.

The research, carried out in the middle of July by pollsters GfK NOP reveals that 2,329,500 people had to borrow on average £1,130 to pay for a summer getaway.

Now I like a holiday as much as the next insolvency practitioner and to many, a spend of just over £1,000 on a big holiday may not be too shocking. In fact, I wonder if the ‘real’ figure for holiday spending is much more, but the individuals surveyed didn’t have an accurate idea of exactly how much they would spend: the flights and hotel may be around £1,000 but how much more unplanned spending goes on food and booze, sightseeing trips and souvenirs?

In my experience, the problem often tends to be that the holiday spending comes on top of other unsecured debts that have mounted up through the year. This kind of spending can be the final straw for many people, who return home to credit card bills and loan repayments that they simply can’t afford.

The good news is, no matter how debts have been incurred, there is help available. If you’ve returned from your summer holidays and found that you’ve got more than a few photos and a bottle of the local firewater to remind you of your trip, give me or one of my colleagues a call on 01709 331300. We can help.

More help for troubled companies?

Government consults over 'restructuring moratorium'

The Government has announced proposals for a restructuring moratorium to protect companies whilst a rescue plan is put in place to help save businesses and preserve jobs.  A moratorium is basically a protected ‘breathing space’ during which no action can be taken against the company by its creditors. The moratorium is aimed at companies where the underlying business is fundamentally viable but because of the prospect of future insolvency or financial distress there is a need to protect the business from creditors whilst some restructuring is carried out. The moratorium is proposed for use alongside the existing Company Voluntary Arrangement or Scheme of Arrangement procedures.

The proposals provide for a moratorium which would last for three months, which would commence following a court hearing at which creditors could be represented. The company would continue to operate under the existing management and directors however they would be bound by a set of obligations and potential sanctions for misuse of the procedure. A licensed insolvency practitioner would be involved at key stages to help safeguard the interests of creditors and other stakeholders.

I welcome this consultation as I have been an advocate of this type of moratorium for many years. The CVA procedure is often frustrated by the lack of any effective moratorium – although a moratorium is technically available to qualifying companies that are proposing a CVA, the requirements are widely considered to be so onerous that they are seldom used by IPs. This is in stark contrast to the Interim Order that is available for debtors who are proposing Individual Voluntary Arrangements (IVAs) where rapid and straightforward protection is available to allow a breathing space whilst an IVA isformulated and put forward to creditors.

The consultation ends in the middle of October so I eagerly await the Government’s response. This could be a timely measure which could have a real impact in terms of saving businesses and jobs.

'Corporate undertakers' become 'company doctors'

Research shows that the insolvency profession is good for the economy

It's great to have some good news about the economy and about the insolvency profession. Research carried out by ComRes, a leading polling and research agency, shows that the UK’s insolvency industry helped to save nearly two million jobs in companies going through insolvency and rescued around six thousand (5,851) businesses last year. In addition, the UK’s Insolvency Practitioners who work on corporate insolvencies spend nearly a quarter of their time on preventing insolvencies rather than dealing with companies that have already gone to the wall.

Hopefully this will go some way towards changing people's opinions of what insolvency practitioners like me actually do. Before I joined the profession, my own experience of dealing with an insolvency practitioner had not been entirely positive. I often think back to that time and as a result I am determined to be the type of practitioner who is focussed on delivering the right advice at the right time, concentrating on preserving businesses and jobs, rescuing companies and keeping people out of bankruptcy where possible and practical.

My goal is to give balanced, impartial advice on all the options, to allow people to make their own informed decision. Business owners know far more about their business than I ever will, so my job is to offer the various tools in my insolvency 'toolbox' and help them understand how they can help deal with debt and insolvency problems in their individual circumstances.

But I can't work miracles. I can't turn back the clock and I can't wave a magic wand. The sooner that I am asked to help, the more options there will be and the more chance we will have in turning things around.

So if you've been worrying about debt but you've been concerned about asking advice from a 'corporate undertaker', why not call me, Dr Debt, the company doctor. My number is 01709 331300 and it costs nothing to have a chat about your options.

Ostrich mentality to debt is still a big problem

Sticking your head in the sand will not help deal with debt problems

Research published today shows that many people are too ashamed to ask for help with their debt problems, preferring to ignore them in the hope that they will go away. A poll carried out for 'R3', the insolvency profession's leading association (of which I am a member) shows that 21% of people with debt problems haven't contacted anyone for help because "It's easier not thinking about it" whilst 14% are worried what people will think if they seek help about their debts. In addition, 30% of people with money problems haven't even told their partner or family about their situation.

Unfortunately I see this situation all the time. People come to me when the situation is really desperate, where someone has put off taking advice sooner because they were worried about what people would think or what their partner or family might say. (Sometimes people are even worried about what I would think - trust me, I've seen it all, nothing shocks me any more!)

The old saying 'better late than never' is true and there are things that can be done to ease the situation even when things seem bleak. But the sooner that someone takes advice about debt problems, there will be more options and the options themselves will be more palatable and more attractive to creditors.

So if you are worried about your debts, whether they are business or personal, why not give me a call on 01709 331300. You can meet with me free of charge and I'll help you to find out what all your options are. It's confidential and I promise that I won't judge or be shocked: I'll just try to help.

Budget offers help for struggling businesses

Chancellor pledges more help for firms with unaffordable tax bills

In his Budget speech, the Chancellor of the Exchequer Alistair Darling announced that the Business Payment Support Scheme will be extended for the life of the next Parliament.

Under the scheme, HM Revenue and Customs will agree to requests from businesses to defer unaffordable tax payments in an attempt to safeguard jobs and prevent the damaging effects of high numbers of insolvencies. Since the scheme was introduced in November 2008, over £5bn in unpaid taxes has been re-negotiated by 160,000 businesses employing more than 1.4 million people.

There had been speculation that the scheme would be abolished during 2010 as the Treasury tried to maximise tax revenue as part of the Government’s efforts to cope with the record levels of public borrowing. However, the scheme has been popular and is considered to have been instrumental in saving many businesses and jobs.

However, in a separate announcement the Government has announced that from 1 April 2010 any requests for time to pay agreements for tax debts in excess of £1m will need to be accompanied by an independent business review to demonstrate the long term viability of the business. HMRC estimates that this will affect approximately 1 in every thousand requests.

This announcement will affect few firms but I’ve seen that even small firms are being increasingly asked to provide accounts when requesting time to pay agreements.

If your business is facing unaffordable tax bills, call Paul Moorhead today on 01709 331300 for help and advice. We can help arrange a time to pay agreement with HMRC.

David Cameron announces proposed change to 'insolvency threshold'

Conservatives indicate willingness to tinker with insolvency rules

On The Andrew Marr Show on BBC1 yesterday, Conservative leader David Cameron announced plans to boost small busineses as part of a package of measures to stimulate jobs, wealth and enterprise and to allow the country to "trade its way out of recession." As well as reducing the amount of time it takes to set up a new business and encouraging social landlords to permit tenants to operate a business from their homes, Cameron announced that a Conservative Government would raise the "insolvency threshold" to £2,000 from the current level of £750. He stated that more small businesses had gone "bankrupt" in this recession than previous ones and that "a number have been pushed there by the government itself."

At present, a creditor can petition for an individual's bankruptcy if they are owed more than £750, whilst a company can be wound up following a statutory demand for a debt in excess of £750. But a company can also be wound up by the court if a creditor obtains a judgment for any amount and is then unable to enforce it - for instance, if bailiffs report that there are no valuable assets to remove. So increasing the threshold for companies won't necessarily make it more difficult for a creditor to wind up a struggling company, but it will give some protection for sole traders, who make up the majority of small businesses in the UK.

The threshold of £750 hasn't changed since the Insolvency Act gained Royal Assent in 1986 so it seems reasonable to revisit it. In the 24 years since the legislation was passed, inflation alone would mean that £750 would be more like £1,700 in today's money. I suspect that the threshold hasn't been revisited sooner because the legislation was poorly drafted: the threshold relating to bankruptcy can be changed by statutory instrument but there is no corresponding provision for company winding-up, making it all a bit messy.

But there is another issue: by raising the insolvency threshold, will this lead to more businesses experiencing further problems of non-payment by customers? Would this send out the wrong message to businesses, encouraging them to delay payment? I hope not.

Place your bets... airline insolvency speculation gone too far?

Bookmakers offer odds on the next airline to go bust

The effects of the global economic downturn were felt clearly in 2009, not least by the large number of well-known businesses that became insolvent. Over the past 12 months, these have included Borders, Blacks Leisure, JJB Sports and Cobra Beer. More recently, Flyglobespan, Scotland's biggest airline, collapsed when it's parent company went into administration, leaving thousands of passengers stranded. Airlines are particularly vulnerable in a recession, as they tend to rely heavily on discretionary spending and healthy levels of international trade, and a number of aviation businesses have crashed and burned recently. But even in this macro-economic context, it appears to be pretty poor taste to encourage speculation over which airline will be the next to collapse into insolvency, particularly given the chaos and upset for travellers.

Yet it would appear that Irish bookmaker Paddy Power is only too happy to offer odds on the next aviation insolvency. Monarch Airline is the bookie's favourite with odds of 4/1 that it will be the next to go bust and ground it's fleet. Fancy a flutter? You can get odds of 14/1 that British Airways will be the next victim of the credit crunch, or 18/1 that Bmibaby will be the latest to succumb. Virgin Atlantic and easyJet are relative outsiders at 80/1 but it seems that the bookies are putting their faith in God and and Uncle Sam: Vatican Airways and Barack Obama's Air Force One presidential jet fleet are 500/1 and 1000/1 respectively. God bless America!

If your business is having financial problems, I can help. Give me a call on 01709 331300.

How to avoid insolvency in the first place #2

It's all about profit

I get asked to help businesses because they’ve hit (or are heading for) a financial brick wall. Something usually triggers the invitation that I’ve received: it could be that the bank manager is concerned about the way the bank account has been run recently; it could be a threatening letter from a major creditor or even a winding up petition. Whatever it is, it’s always to do with money, or the lack of it. So my first job is to find out what makes the business tick from a financial point of view.

All too often, I am met with blank expressions when I ask for costings, cashflow forecasts and profit-and-loss forecasts. This type of financial information can be collectively referred to as “management accounts” and unless business owners have good management information at their fingertips, they can’t make proper decisions about how to run their business. Business owners often know exactly what their turnover will be for the month or year and they easily reel off figures for how much a particular job or contract is worth in terms of the selling price. But the key issue isn't price - it's profitability. There’s no point being a “busy fool” as one of my former colleagues used to say. That’s why it’s essential to know which areas are profitable and which need to be overhauled, re-designed or scrapped. Almost invariably, it’s far better to make a 10% net profit on a turnover of £100,000 than merely break even or make a loss on a turnover of £200,000. It’s no surprise that businesses who don't have a proper handle on their costs end up with serious or even terminal debt problems.

The problem tends to stem from the fact that businesses are set up by people who are extremely good at their job, whatever that job may be, and who are driven by a desire for the potential benefits of self employment. So a good panel beater, or chef, or IT expert, decides to go into business to offer their expert services to the world. Great. However, that panel beater, or chef, or IT expert may have very little knowledge and experience of actually running a business, which usually requires a completely different set of skills. And even if they have those skills, the need to do the business, beat panels, cook great food or do great digital stuff often gets in the way of running the business.

Most firms aren’t big enough to need a full time accountant or bookkeeper, but the good news is that there are a number of people around who can spend as much, or as little, time as necessary in making sure that the wheels don’t fall off your business. They make sure that you have the information you need to decide how best to run your business and the (usually quite low) cost is usually recovered many times over in terms of better decision-making and enhanced profitability.

Try searching for accountants and bookkeepers in your area. Or feel free to contact me and I will recommend some who I've worked with in the past.

www.moorheadsavage.co.uk

How to avoid insolvency in the first place: #1

A well-organised business is a successful business

In my years as an Insolvency Practitioner, I’ve found that two things always seem to go hand in hand. These two things are disorganised businesses and insolvency.

We all know that there is a long list of things that we’d all like to get round to doing, but we just haven’t got the time. Some things fit into the category of “nice to do but not essential.” So it would be nice to buy a new plant for the office, or replace the broken clock that is always 15 minutes slow. But these things don’t really damage a business. There’s no need to lose any sleep over them.

But some things are critical and if they get forgotten, the wheels will start to fall off and everything will end in tears. Whether it’s taxing the company van, making sure that invoices are paid on time and decent bookkeeping to make sure that everything is properly accounted for, some things just have to be done. The problem is that it’s easy to concentrate on doing the business, rather than running it.

Happily for smaller businesses, help is at hand. There’s no need to take on extra members of staff as there are a number of excellent virtual assistants, part-time bookkeepers and office support professionals, who can make your life a lot easier. They can spend as much or as little time as necessary, either working in your office or theirs, making sure that all the little (but crucial) things get done. So whether it’s answering the phone in a professional manner, organising mailshots to potential customers or day-to-day bookkeeping, there are plenty of people to turn to.

Try a web search for virtual assistants in your area - or, if you prefer, I can recommend some for you to consider.

http://www.moorheadsavage.co.uk/