Account Preservation plans in aspic for now

Government opt-out safeguards UK rescue culture

The Government has announced that it will opt out of European Commission plans to introduce a cross-border debt recovery tool that would have damaged the UK's business rescue culture. The European Account Preservation Order (EAPO) would have given courts anywhere in the EU the power to freeze funds in UK business' bank accounts without warning. R3, the leading insolvency trade association, had criticised plans to introduce the EAPO on the basis that it would give individual creditors the power to jeopardise the chances of business turnaround by starving companies of cash when they need it most. The UK is widely considered to be at the forefront of business turnaround and rescue and it was feared that the loose drafting of the EAPO would stifle attempts to rescue companies, leading to lower returns to creditors and damaging the wider economy.

The Government opt out is not a surprise as the Commons Select Committee on European Scrutiny had flagged up concerns regarding the EAPO during the summer. The Committee noted that, "Although the Government supports the principle of an European Account Preservation Order, we understand from recent communication with departmental officials that the Government thinks the text, as currently drafted, goes too far in favouring the rights of creditors at the expense of debtors." In particular, it was felt that there was insufficient requirement to demonstrate that there was a risk of assets being disposed of or concealed, meaning that applications could be made regardless of whether the situation merited the use of the EAPO.

This looks like a sensible approach: it is important to ensure that assets are handled properly at all stages of business recovery. But safeguarding assets must be balanced by the need to ensure that a company has the best chance of being rescued as a going concern, in order to save jobs, minimise the effect on supply chains and trading partners, and maximise the return to creditors.

What a wind up

Increase in number of firms being wound up by creditors

Insolvency statistics published today by the government’s Insolvency Service reveal that there has been a sharp increase in the number of firms being wound up by creditors in the past three months. The number of compulsory liquidations, where a creditor asks the courts to close down a business due to non-payment of debts, increased by nearly 20% compared to the previous quarter.

This looks like a worrying trend, showing that many firms are struggling to pay their way in the continuing economic gloom. Creditors are becoming impatient – many will be suffering with their own financial problems - and they are increasingly prepared to follow through on threats to wind up businesses that cannot afford to pay their bills.

Whilst it may be tempting to keep making promises of payment to creditors, when those promises are broken, the consequences can be catastrophic. The good news is that there are ways of dealing with mounting debts that will allow the company to continue and the sooner that a business owner takes advice, the more palatable the options that are available.

In particular, a Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA) can be put in place with the help of a licensed insolvency practitioner to protect the company from legal action whilst a turnaround plan is followed, allowing a company to recover from its cash-flow problems. In recent months, Moorhead Savage has set up three CVAs for businesses in the Sheffield City Region, safeguarding dozens of jobs in the process.

If you would like to chat about how we can help your business, call me today on 01709 331300.

Shops 'til they drop

What has caused the sudden wave of retail insolvencies?

It has been a bad few days for retailers. A number of well-known names have succumbed to the effects of the retail slow-down, with Jane Norman and Habitat appointing administrators, TJ Hughes reportedly on the brink of entering administration and an announcement from chocolatier Thorntons that they intend to close up to half of their high street shops.This has come in the wake of retail figures for May that showed sales had slumped by 1.4%, reversing an increase of 1.1% the previous month.

Many retailers have been struggling for some time to keep their heads above water, with shoppers choosing to put off major purchases in the face of increasing economic uncertainty. Increasing food and fuel prices have hit consumers hard and many are concerned about job insecurity. The easy availability of credit that stoked the high street spending boom of the last decade is long gone. Shops have suffered from poor cashflow and slim margins, particularly where they are servicing high levels of borrowing.

But why the sudden wave of insolvencies? Traditionally, landlords collect rental payments from their tenants on a quarterly basis, in advance. The end of June sees another 'quarter day' when many retailers' rents will fall due for payment. With little opportunity to re-let shops to new tenants, landlords will be tempted to enforce harshly the terms of their existing leases, to prevent a melt-down of rental income. However, if landlords fail to work with their tenants when times are hard, they face the possibility of losing their tenant altogether if the tenant becomes insolvent. By using an administration procedure, struggling retailers are protected from their landlords taking action to lock them out whilst a new buyer is found, and a potential purchaser will often have the upper hand in any negotiations over future rents.

And what effect will this have on suppliers? When large firms become insolvent, they often leave many small suppliers high and dry, with little or no prospect of repayment. This can have a knock-on effect on their viability, and I'm afraid that many smaller businesses may be hit hard by the failure of these high street names.

But as always, the message is that help is at hand, and the sooner that advice is sought, the more palatable the options will be. Just because a major customer has let you down, it doesn't have to mean the end of your business as well. Call Paul Moorhead of Moorhead Savage today on 01709 331300 and find out what we can do to help.

No longer safe as houses?

More pain ahead for the property market

Latest figures released by the Bank of England have shown that mortgage approvals in April dropped to their lowest level since records began in 1993. The reduction in lending is likely to cause more problems in the housing market, with Morgan Stanley predicting that house prices will fall 10% by the end of 2012.

Not only is this bad news for homeowners, but it may also start to cause further problems in the beleagured banking sector. Many banks are still massively exposed to moves in house prices, due to mortgage deals arranged during the last decade. In particular, The Telegraph reported that Lloyds TSB may be hard hit, with up to one quarter of its mortgage customers in negative equity by 2012. Analysts suggested that this could mean that mortgages totalling up to £90 billion were potentially affected, at this one bank alone.

However, as always, statistics can tell a thousand different stories and the Council of Mortgage Lenders issued a prediction that 'net' mortgage lending (stripping out redemptions and repayments) would actually rise during 2011 to £9 billion, up from £8 billion last year. This may sound like a lot of money, certainly enough to keep the current Mrs Moorhead in the manner to which she would like to become accustomed. But in 2006, the last year that mortgage lending rose, the total lending was £110 billion. That's right, £110 billion. So we are currently running at about 8.2% of 2006 mortgage lending levels. No wonder the housing market is in the doldrums, but also no wonder that so many homeowners, and banks, found themselves in seriously deep water.

As ever, when money matters go wrong, we can help. My number is 01709 331300.

Interesting times ahead?

Rising inflation raises concerns over interest rates

The UK Consumer Price Index annual rate of inflation rose to 4.5% in April 2011, its highest level since October 2008, according to figures released today. This has led to speculation that the Bank of England may raise interest rates in the coming months, causing more problems for struggling businesses.

A survey carried out by R3 found that many business owners are predicting that any rise in interest rates will have a serious impact on their business, with 7% of small business owners believing that they are likely to become insolvent if interest rates rise to between 2% and 3.5%. If rates climb to between 4% and 5%, the number of businesses at risk increases to 18%. The base rate was 5% in 2007.

The Office for National Statistics reported that inflation rose to 4.4% in February 2011, followed by a slight fall to 4% in March before increasing to 4.5% in April, way above the Bank of England’s target of 2%, which is likely to put pressure on the Monetary Policy Committee to increase rates.

Many commentators have suggested that historically low interest rates have helped to keep the number of business failures artificially low in recent months as debt interest payments are tied to the base rate for many businesses. However any increase in the cost of borrowing is likely to have an adverse effect on cash flow and may be the last straw for many ailing businesses.

Consumers will also feel the impact of any rise in interest rates as the cost of mortgages increases. An increase of two percentage points, whilst still low in historic terms, would add £166 per month to the cost of a £100,000 mortgage.

Rising prices put additional pressure on businesses and individuals, and increasing costs are likely to damage any fragile signs of recovery, adding to the finacial problems of many.

Moorhead Savage has the expertise and experience to help sort out financial problems - even when things seem bleak. For a free, no obligation consultation and an unbiased summary of which solutions are right for you, call Paul Moorhead today on 01709 331300. It's always good to talk.

Missed the tax deadline? It isn't the end of the world but act quickly

£90m penalties windfall for HMRC for late tax payments and tax returns

If you have missed the 31 January deadline for filing your Self Assessment Tax return, you are in good company. You are one of 9 million people who has yet to file their tax return for 2010-11. HM Revenue and Customs are looking forward to collecting around £90m in penalty fees from people who have filed their self assessment tax returns and/or paid the tax due after the 31 January deadline.

But don't be disheartened  - act quickly and you can avoid the situation getting any worse. The penalties charged by HMRC for late filed returns and late payments of tax rise as the delay increases, so if it's simply a question of an oversight, get it in ASAP and you'll save yourself some hard-earned cash.

And the good news is that if you have a 'reasonable excuse' for missing the deadline then you won't have to pay any penalty. But the bad news is that HMRC is unlikely to consider excuses relating to forgetfulness, the consumption of documents by pets, or delays due to overseas excursions, to be 'reasonable.' The rather short list of examples on their website includes documents lost through theft, fire or flood that can't be replaced in time, life-threatening illness, for example a heart attack that prevents you dealing with your tax affairs and the death of a partner shortly before the deadline.

If, however, the reason for the delay is that you know that you cannot afford to pay the tax due on last year's trading, then there is good news. By filing the tax return, even if the tax is unaffordable, you are then in a position to negotiate with HMRC for a 'time to pay' agreement. As long as your returns are filed up to date and you have a reasonable record of compliance with the tax authorities, you can put forward a repayment proposal. HMRC are generally willing to discuss sensible repayment plans, particularly if you approach them at the earliest opportunity.

If tax debts are part of a wider debt problem, it may be that a Voluntary Arrangement is the answer. These come in two flavours - Individual Voluntary Arrangments (IVAs) and Company Voluntary Arrangements (CVAs) depending on whether you trade through a limited company or are a sole trader. VAs of either variety can be a good way to solve cashflow problems and HMRC have a specialist department which deals with IVAs and CVAs, so they know what to look for in a well thought through proposal.

We have lots of experience in dealing with debt problems involving HMRC, so for expert, impartial and confidential advice, call us today on 01709 331300.

Good news for homeowners - but will it last?

Repossessions fall - but is this the calm before the storm?

The Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML) today announced a decline in the number of housed repossessed by mortgage lenders in the second quarter of 2010. In the three months to the end of June, there were 9.400 repossessions, down from 9,800 in the previous quarter and considerably below the same quarter last year, when 11,800 properties were taken back by first charge mortgage lenders.

As a result, the CML have revised down their forecasts for repossessions in 2010 as a whole from 53,000 to 39,000, a reduction of around 25%.

The number of mortgages in arrears has also reduced, with 178,200 mortgages in arrears equivalent to 2.5% or more of the mortgage balance. This is 5% lower than at the end of March and a whopping 17% lower than the same period last year.

These figures have surprised many in the industry, with mortgage difficulties being contained below the levels that the CML expected at the start of the year, and in comparison to the recession at the start of the 1990s.

I don’t want to be accused of talking down this good news. But I’m afraid that this is just a lull, an aberration, before things get worse. There are some important factors that make this downturn different to the 1990s recession. Firstly, the headline interest rate is at an historic low: at some stage, rates will start to increase and many homeowners who are currently struggling to keep their heads above water will sink beneath the waves. Secondly, the Government is struggling to cope with crippling levels of debt and has indicated that wide-ranging cuts in public spending will be used to help balance the books. Nobody knows for certain what the effects of those cuts will be, but rising unemployment and increased job insecurity will surely become a reality for many more homeowners in the months and years to come.

If you have financial problems and are worried about how this will affect your home, call me today on 01709 331300 for a free, no-obligation and confidential chat.

More people than ever are becoming insolvent

Insolvency statistics give cause for concern

Official figures released by the Government’s Insolvency Service today show a 5% increase in the number of people getting into serious financial difficulties in the last three months. Although the number of bankruptcies has dropped by nearly 20% in the past year, the overall number of people becoming insolvent has increased as greater use is made of alternative ways of tackling high debt levels.

It seems clear that many people are struggling to cope with the effects of the downturn and record numbers are becoming insolvent. Job losses and cuts in overtime payments are making life difficult for households. This means that debt that was previously affordable can become a real problem. And as public sector spending cuts start to kick in, the situation is likely to get even worse.

In the first six months of 2010, over 70,000 people have become insolvent – the equivalent of a town the size of Barnsley or Chesterfield.

The cost of becoming bankrupt has increased in recent months and this may have encouraged people to look at alternatives. In particular, the new Debt Relief Order has become more popular since it was introduced last year. The good news is that there is help available – but I would recommend that anyone in difficulties should take advice from a reputable organisation. Beware of unsolicited calls offering advice that sounds too good to be true.

To find out what all your options are, call me today on 01709 331300.

Getting away from it all can lead to problems back home

Millions get into debt for a holiday

The insolvency trade body R3 released figures today showing that over 2 million holidaymakers have got into debt to pay for holidays this year and will spend an average of seven months paying it back.

The research, carried out in the middle of July by pollsters GfK NOP reveals that 2,329,500 people had to borrow on average £1,130 to pay for a summer getaway.

Now I like a holiday as much as the next insolvency practitioner and to many, a spend of just over £1,000 on a big holiday may not be too shocking. In fact, I wonder if the ‘real’ figure for holiday spending is much more, but the individuals surveyed didn’t have an accurate idea of exactly how much they would spend: the flights and hotel may be around £1,000 but how much more unplanned spending goes on food and booze, sightseeing trips and souvenirs?

In my experience, the problem often tends to be that the holiday spending comes on top of other unsecured debts that have mounted up through the year. This kind of spending can be the final straw for many people, who return home to credit card bills and loan repayments that they simply can’t afford.

The good news is, no matter how debts have been incurred, there is help available. If you’ve returned from your summer holidays and found that you’ve got more than a few photos and a bottle of the local firewater to remind you of your trip, give me or one of my colleagues a call on 01709 331300. We can help.

More help for troubled companies?

Government consults over 'restructuring moratorium'

The Government has announced proposals for a restructuring moratorium to protect companies whilst a rescue plan is put in place to help save businesses and preserve jobs.  A moratorium is basically a protected ‘breathing space’ during which no action can be taken against the company by its creditors. The moratorium is aimed at companies where the underlying business is fundamentally viable but because of the prospect of future insolvency or financial distress there is a need to protect the business from creditors whilst some restructuring is carried out. The moratorium is proposed for use alongside the existing Company Voluntary Arrangement or Scheme of Arrangement procedures.

The proposals provide for a moratorium which would last for three months, which would commence following a court hearing at which creditors could be represented. The company would continue to operate under the existing management and directors however they would be bound by a set of obligations and potential sanctions for misuse of the procedure. A licensed insolvency practitioner would be involved at key stages to help safeguard the interests of creditors and other stakeholders.

I welcome this consultation as I have been an advocate of this type of moratorium for many years. The CVA procedure is often frustrated by the lack of any effective moratorium – although a moratorium is technically available to qualifying companies that are proposing a CVA, the requirements are widely considered to be so onerous that they are seldom used by IPs. This is in stark contrast to the Interim Order that is available for debtors who are proposing Individual Voluntary Arrangements (IVAs) where rapid and straightforward protection is available to allow a breathing space whilst an IVA isformulated and put forward to creditors.

The consultation ends in the middle of October so I eagerly await the Government’s response. This could be a timely measure which could have a real impact in terms of saving businesses and jobs.

'Corporate undertakers' become 'company doctors'

Research shows that the insolvency profession is good for the economy

It's great to have some good news about the economy and about the insolvency profession. Research carried out by ComRes, a leading polling and research agency, shows that the UK’s insolvency industry helped to save nearly two million jobs in companies going through insolvency and rescued around six thousand (5,851) businesses last year. In addition, the UK’s Insolvency Practitioners who work on corporate insolvencies spend nearly a quarter of their time on preventing insolvencies rather than dealing with companies that have already gone to the wall.

Hopefully this will go some way towards changing people's opinions of what insolvency practitioners like me actually do. Before I joined the profession, my own experience of dealing with an insolvency practitioner had not been entirely positive. I often think back to that time and as a result I am determined to be the type of practitioner who is focussed on delivering the right advice at the right time, concentrating on preserving businesses and jobs, rescuing companies and keeping people out of bankruptcy where possible and practical.

My goal is to give balanced, impartial advice on all the options, to allow people to make their own informed decision. Business owners know far more about their business than I ever will, so my job is to offer the various tools in my insolvency 'toolbox' and help them understand how they can help deal with debt and insolvency problems in their individual circumstances.

But I can't work miracles. I can't turn back the clock and I can't wave a magic wand. The sooner that I am asked to help, the more options there will be and the more chance we will have in turning things around.

So if you've been worrying about debt but you've been concerned about asking advice from a 'corporate undertaker', why not call me, Dr Debt, the company doctor. My number is 01709 331300 and it costs nothing to have a chat about your options.

Ostrich mentality to debt is still a big problem

Sticking your head in the sand will not help deal with debt problems

Research published today shows that many people are too ashamed to ask for help with their debt problems, preferring to ignore them in the hope that they will go away. A poll carried out for 'R3', the insolvency profession's leading association (of which I am a member) shows that 21% of people with debt problems haven't contacted anyone for help because "It's easier not thinking about it" whilst 14% are worried what people will think if they seek help about their debts. In addition, 30% of people with money problems haven't even told their partner or family about their situation.

Unfortunately I see this situation all the time. People come to me when the situation is really desperate, where someone has put off taking advice sooner because they were worried about what people would think or what their partner or family might say. (Sometimes people are even worried about what I would think - trust me, I've seen it all, nothing shocks me any more!)

The old saying 'better late than never' is true and there are things that can be done to ease the situation even when things seem bleak. But the sooner that someone takes advice about debt problems, there will be more options and the options themselves will be more palatable and more attractive to creditors.

So if you are worried about your debts, whether they are business or personal, why not give me a call on 01709 331300. You can meet with me free of charge and I'll help you to find out what all your options are. It's confidential and I promise that I won't judge or be shocked: I'll just try to help.

Budget offers help for struggling businesses

Chancellor pledges more help for firms with unaffordable tax bills

In his Budget speech, the Chancellor of the Exchequer Alistair Darling announced that the Business Payment Support Scheme will be extended for the life of the next Parliament.

Under the scheme, HM Revenue and Customs will agree to requests from businesses to defer unaffordable tax payments in an attempt to safeguard jobs and prevent the damaging effects of high numbers of insolvencies. Since the scheme was introduced in November 2008, over £5bn in unpaid taxes has been re-negotiated by 160,000 businesses employing more than 1.4 million people.

There had been speculation that the scheme would be abolished during 2010 as the Treasury tried to maximise tax revenue as part of the Government’s efforts to cope with the record levels of public borrowing. However, the scheme has been popular and is considered to have been instrumental in saving many businesses and jobs.

However, in a separate announcement the Government has announced that from 1 April 2010 any requests for time to pay agreements for tax debts in excess of £1m will need to be accompanied by an independent business review to demonstrate the long term viability of the business. HMRC estimates that this will affect approximately 1 in every thousand requests.

This announcement will affect few firms but I’ve seen that even small firms are being increasingly asked to provide accounts when requesting time to pay agreements.

If your business is facing unaffordable tax bills, call Paul Moorhead today on 01709 331300 for help and advice. We can help arrange a time to pay agreement with HMRC.